<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shoq Value &#187; Definitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoqvalue.com/category/politics/definitions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoqvalue.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:06:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>An Extended Definition Of &#8220;Emo Progressive,&#8221; And Why It Matters</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/an-extended-definition-of-emo-progressive-and-why-it-matters</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/an-extended-definition-of-emo-progressive-and-why-it-matters#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emo Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn greenwald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jane hamsher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro Left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=3783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Update:&#160; This term has been recast as &#8220;Puritopian.&#8221;&#160; Emo Progressive was never coined by either Joy Ann Reid or myself. It had already gotten traction before we came together and tried to give it greater definition. We succeeded, perhaps too well. Like others, we were never comfortable with it because it was far too disparaging <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/an-extended-definition-of-emo-progressive-and-why-it-matters">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/an-extended-definition-of-emo-progressive-and-why-it-matters/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Punk Patriot: Welfare Talking Points No.1</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/punkpatriot-welfare1</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/punkpatriot-welfare1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punk Patriot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=2413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I had suggested to the Punk that he make a series of shorter, more focused explainer videos, and find a background a bit nicer than this laundry. I&#39;m elated by his choices here. The <a href="http://shoqvalue.com/urban-dictionary-contributions">Concorporative</a>&#8482; Flag is absolutely brilliant. All <a href="http://shoqvalue.com/urban-dictionary-contributions">Corpizens</a>&#8482; should have one.</p>
<p>I think the Punk is on his way <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/punkpatriot-welfare1">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/punkpatriot-welfare1/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dave Weigel on C-Span; Discussing What I&#8217;m Calling &#8220;Trio-Conservatism</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/weigel-on-trio-conservatism</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/weigel-on-trio-conservatism#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Weigel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Definitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teabaggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaparty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=1817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a wonderful interview, and like most of the Washington Journal good stuff, it was buried in the early morning segment when only we hard core @cspanWJ watchers even saw it.</p>
<p>You really need to spend some time with this segment. He covers a lot of ground, and he knows his subject(s) really well. He&#39;s <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/weigel-on-trio-conservatism">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/weigel-on-trio-conservatism/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

