<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shoq Value &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoqvalue.com/category/support/technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoqvalue.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 12:49:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Narrative Authority: Can Institutional Respect Be Crowd-Sourced?</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/narrative-authority-can-institutional-respect-be-crowd-sourced</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/narrative-authority-can-institutional-respect-be-crowd-sourced#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shoqs Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cjr.org/the_news_frontier/who_says.php">Who Says: Narrative Authority In a Fragmented World</a>
<p>Jay Rosen tweeted this seminal post by Megan Garber, articulating what the web and digital media are doing to authority memes and journalism&#39;s role in this bizarre new world.</p>
<p>Since the need to manage the tangled and competing taxonomic hierarchies of such a Narrative Big Brother has been <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/narrative-authority-can-institutional-respect-be-crowd-sourced">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/narrative-authority-can-institutional-respect-be-crowd-sourced/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the web lost your mind?</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/has-the-web-lost-your-mind</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/has-the-web-lost-your-mind#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In an inadequately brief, but crucially important review or what is sure to be an even more important and discussed book, Ellen Ullman, asks, &#34;<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/11/AR2010021103897.html" target="_blank">is the wisdom of &#160;the crowd, actually a lie</a>?&#34;&#160;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A self-confessed &#34;humanistic softie,&#34; Jaron Lanier is fighting to wrest control of technology from the &#34;ascendant tribe&#34; of technologists who believe <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/has-the-web-lost-your-mind">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/has-the-web-lost-your-mind/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Social Media Ruined the Internet?</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/has-social-media-ruined-the-internet</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/has-social-media-ruined-the-internet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis and Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Explainers & Primers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I missed &#34;<a href="http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2009/12/why_this_decade.php?page=1" target="_blank">Why this Decade Sucked,</a>&#34; by Ed Edroso, back in December. Wish I hadn&#39;t. While it&#39;s over the top in spots, by and large, it&#39;s spot on,&#160; and reminds me of Norman Solomon&#39;s words in the mid 90s, when he quite rightly warned that the Internet would empower the status quo, while <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/has-social-media-ruined-the-internet">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/has-social-media-ruined-the-internet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Twitter matters, and why it will endure.</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/why-twitter-will-endure</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/why-twitter-will-endure#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis and Impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/weekinreview/03carr.html" target="_blank">&#34;Why Twitter Will Endure,&#34;</a>&#160; New York Time&#39;s education and media czar, David Carr, writes perhaps the best overall description of Twitter and its overall value to civilization, better than anyone I&#39;ve read in quite awhile. It&#39;s still not going to help your grandma understand Twitter, but it may help any of your <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/why-twitter-will-endure">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/why-twitter-will-endure/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The new Twitter retweets: be afraid.</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/the-new-twitter-retweets-be-afraid</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/the-new-twitter-retweets-be-afraid#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Retweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The new Twitter retweet system has been unleashed, and it&#39;s a classic example of taking something that worked, and breaking it. Rather than simplify something most regular Twitter users understood and used rather creatively, they have now created a hybrid pastiche of behaviors where retweets will mean different things to different people, depending on how <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/the-new-twitter-retweets-be-afraid">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/the-new-twitter-retweets-be-afraid/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
