<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shoq Value &#187; Tips Index</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoqvalue.com/category/support/twitter-tips/tips-index/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoqvalue.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So What Do The &#8220;.@&#8221; Characters Mean In Some Twitter Replies</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/what-does-dot-atsign-mean-on-twitter</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/what-does-dot-atsign-mean-on-twitter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=2617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This page will explain, in the simplest possible terms, why many use a period or other character before a @Twittername. While I once wrote a widely circulated <a href="http://socialsupport.pbworks.com/w/page/17139123/Workaround-for-Twitter-@Replies-Issue#view=page">explanation</a>, it was rather dense, and I find that at least a third of my stream still doesn&#39;t understand the issue. Thus, I felt a simpler explainer <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/what-does-dot-atsign-mean-on-twitter">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/what-does-dot-atsign-mean-on-twitter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Use Twitter&#8217;s Built-In Retweet Feature Too Often</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/dont-use-twitter-retweets</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/dont-use-twitter-retweets#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hash Tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Welcome Wagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=2543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#160;</p>
<p>It&#39;s been well over a year since Twitter implemented its built-in <a href="http://shoqvalue.com/the-new-twitter-retweets-be-afraid">&#34;new&#34; retweet</a> feature, which for many of us, immediately wrecked what had been one of Twitter&#39;s best features: the old retweeting style which evolved organically from the user-base, and with no input from Twitter whatever.</p>
<p>Naturally, something that millions of people loved just had <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/dont-use-twitter-retweets">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/dont-use-twitter-retweets/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About The New Change To Twitter Search</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/about-new-twitter-search</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/about-new-twitter-search#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tips Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=2081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE1:<span style="font-weight: bold;">&#160; </span>If <a href="http://selnd.com/d56JNe">this article is accurate</a>, then Twitter is now claiming that their new search&#8212;which prompted the post below&#8212;was just an &#34;experiment.&#34;&#160; (Conducted live with 100 million users? Hmmm)</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If true, then all of this drama was about nothing at all. As I said initially, for all we know, it&#39;s a bug. When <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/about-new-twitter-search">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/about-new-twitter-search/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shoq&#8217;s Tips</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/shoqtips</link>
		<comments>http://shoqvalue.com/shoqtips#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?page_id=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="quote-section" style="font-size: 90%;"><p>This is an index page, pointing to older pages that have not yet been moved to this blog. They will be, as I have time to get around to another project.</p></blockquote>
Twitter Tips
<ul class="qq-list qq-list1">
<li><a href="http://bit.ly/shoqtips">Twitter Tips, Tricks &#38; Workaround</a>s
		Including backup services, tweet composition, rules, and other helpful things to know, not easily <p class="link-more"><a href="http://shoqvalue.com/shoqtips">- Read More -</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://shoqvalue.com/shoqtips/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

