<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The reviews roll in: New Retweet= #FAIL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shoqvalue.com/the-reviews-roll-in-new-retweet-fail/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shoqvalue.com/the-reviews-roll-in-new-retweet-fail</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:48:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mcwbr</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/the-reviews-roll-in-new-retweet-fail/comment-page-1#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>mcwbr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=379#comment-419</guid>
		<description>Good suggestion. I intend to try your experiment. At the risk of eating crow, I&#039;m going to bet right now that a 2nd newRT will also generate a doppleganger. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It has occurred to me that the &quot;doppleganger&quot; might actually BE the new RT—that it&#039;s not a kludge to make 3rd party apps work, it&#039;s a kludge to make the new RTs work. The Dilbert explanation is too long, but I had assumed the new RT would be a new weak entity in the database, with a pointer to the original tweet, a pointer to the retweeter and a date-time stamp. Maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good suggestion. I intend to try your experiment. At the risk of eating crow, I&#39;m going to bet right now that a 2nd newRT will also generate a doppleganger. </p>
<p>It has occurred to me that the &#8220;doppleganger&#8221; might actually BE the new RT—that it&#39;s not a kludge to make 3rd party apps work, it&#39;s a kludge to make the new RTs work. The Dilbert explanation is too long, but I had assumed the new RT would be a new weak entity in the database, with a pointer to the original tweet, a pointer to the retweeter and a date-time stamp. Maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcwbr</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/the-reviews-roll-in-new-retweet-fail/comment-page-1#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>mcwbr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=379#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Good suggestion. I intend to try your experiment. At the risk of eating crow, I&#039;m going to bet right now that a 2nd newRT will also generate a doppleganger. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It has occurred to me that the &quot;doppleganger&quot; might actually BE the new RT—that it&#039;s not a kludge to make 3rd party apps work, it&#039;s a kludge to make the new RTs work. The Dilbert explanation is too long, but I had assumed the new RT would be a new weak entity in the database, with a pointer to the original tweet, a pointer to the retweeter and a date-time stamp. Maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good suggestion. I intend to try your experiment. At the risk of eating crow, I&#39;m going to bet right now that a 2nd newRT will also generate a doppleganger. </p>
<p>It has occurred to me that the &#8220;doppleganger&#8221; might actually BE the new RT—that it&#39;s not a kludge to make 3rd party apps work, it&#39;s a kludge to make the new RTs work. The Dilbert explanation is too long, but I had assumed the new RT would be a new weak entity in the database, with a pointer to the original tweet, a pointer to the retweeter and a date-time stamp. Maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoq</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/the-reviews-roll-in-new-retweet-fail/comment-page-1#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=379#comment-392</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  But now you have to test to see if the doppleganger is generated if you are the 2nd retweeter of the same item.  If you&#039;re correct, I would think it must be, thus, that&#039;s a huge amount of replication. It could also be an interim bug, or a test. I would try it again in a few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  But now you have to test to see if the doppleganger is generated if you are the 2nd retweeter of the same item.  If you&#39;re correct, I would think it must be, thus, that&#39;s a huge amount of replication. It could also be an interim bug, or a test. I would try it again in a few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcwbr</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/the-reviews-roll-in-new-retweet-fail/comment-page-1#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>mcwbr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=379#comment-389</guid>
		<description>...How do I know it&#039;s a copy? I created a 140 character tweet and new RT&#039;d it. The copy was truncated. The new RT was not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;How do I know it&#39;s a copy? I created a 140 character tweet and new RT&#39;d it. The copy was truncated. The new RT was not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcwbr</title>
		<link>http://shoqvalue.com/the-reviews-roll-in-new-retweet-fail/comment-page-1#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>mcwbr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 06:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shoqvalue.com/?p=379#comment-390</guid>
		<description>I found this out by experimenting with two accounnts: When you use the new RT, it also generates what appears to be a classic RT. You can only see it, though, if you do a search. It will not show up in normal home timeline of a 3rd party app such as TweetDeck. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Say I new RT @Sally. Sally will see it on the web, but not in Tweetdeck home timeline. (Nor will anyone else using a 3rd Party app) However, if Sally creates a search column &quot;@Sally,&quot; she will see a copy of the new RT (Providing Twitter is not dumping my tweets because it&#039;s busy)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If Sally is using a browser and clicks the @Sally sidebar, she also won&#039;t see the RT. But she will if she does a search &quot;@Sally.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think this RT copy was meant to be a kludge that would allow 3rd party apps to see the new RT. But it&#039;s not working for some reason. I can only speculate that it has to do with a database stored procedure that is called from the API, and that the same stored procedure is called from the sidebar link. The stored proc fires a query that for some reason filters out the retro RT generated by the new RT, so the kludge doesn&#039;t work. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Back when Twitter was asking for comments about the new RT, I informed them of this. It should be a simple thing to fix, but so far they haven&#039;t. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you do a search on &quot;@Shoq&quot; you will see a new-style RT I created to demonstrate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this out by experimenting with two accounnts: When you use the new RT, it also generates what appears to be a classic RT. You can only see it, though, if you do a search. It will not show up in normal home timeline of a 3rd party app such as TweetDeck. </p>
<p>Say I new RT @Sally. Sally will see it on the web, but not in Tweetdeck home timeline. (Nor will anyone else using a 3rd Party app) However, if Sally creates a search column &#8220;@Sally,&#8221; she will see a copy of the new RT (Providing Twitter is not dumping my tweets because it&#39;s busy)</p>
<p>If Sally is using a browser and clicks the @Sally sidebar, she also won&#39;t see the RT. But she will if she does a search &#8220;@Sally.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this RT copy was meant to be a kludge that would allow 3rd party apps to see the new RT. But it&#39;s not working for some reason. I can only speculate that it has to do with a database stored procedure that is called from the API, and that the same stored procedure is called from the sidebar link. The stored proc fires a query that for some reason filters out the retro RT generated by the new RT, so the kludge doesn&#39;t work. </p>
<p>Back when Twitter was asking for comments about the new RT, I informed them of this. It should be a simple thing to fix, but so far they haven&#39;t. </p>
<p>If you do a search on &#8220;@Shoq&#8221; you will see a new-style RT I created to demonstrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
