Thursday, April 1st is Rachel #Maddow's Birthday

Update 1:  Today is the day. Add #maddow to your tweets.

Update 2:  SIGN HER BIRTHDAY CARD. By adding a comment to @sluggahjells's diary on @dailyKos.

Background

Without going into all the reasons why we worship her for proving that the entire Fourth Estate is not yet merely a lawn sale, let's just say it would be fun to make this day an event for her—and all of us.  After all, it's been one of the better damn weeks this nation has had in a mighty long while, and Rachel Maddow was a core asset throughout this miserable bloody Health Care Reform battle.  That it's also April Fool's day makes the possibilities all the more delicious to contemplate.

As I was just informed of this 10 minutes ago, I am not sure of what #gametags might be fun to play yet, but I'll get with @lizzWinstead and others and plot something out.  If you have some ideas to bring on game day, please do tweet them. Naturally, we will have to run all plans through General Soros.  Please check this page frequently for updates. Please use the Tweet button below—and then favorite it for reference.

The Event Video

This is the fabulous video that @rayk58 made to kick off the event. I was under the impression that the idea came from the @Maddow program itself, and the video evolved from that. Apparently, it was all Ray, all the time. Congrats to Ray for a great idea. Sorry I didn't know enough to credit him in the first edition of this post. FYI: I never had suggested anywhere in this post that this was in any way my idea. I'm just the resident good ideas pimp :)

 

What Are We Doing?

::Shrug:: At minimum, we're going to include the "#maddow" #gametags in our tweets.  When enough of them appear, Twitter staff will greenlight it (we hope) and it "trends," and thus, immediately shows up on Twitter's search apps as a so-called "trending topic."

Beyond that, we don't know what the day will bring.  At the very least, ensuring that "#Maddow" is in our tweets. How often is up to you. You can be sure the ideas will be flowing.

Be sure to follow @maddowTag  for more info — Don't panic, it's just @shoq behind the curtain. 

Also follow idea founder @rayk58 and his @madbdaytweets

Probably best you follow @shoq too, or he whines. We don't know just how @maddowTag will work yet, if at all.

How Do We Communicate About This?

Uh.. with the #Maddow Tag?

The Only Rules

  • Don't Be Annoying. — Don't tweet:  "#maddow #maddow #maddow #maddow #maddow."
    You'll just piss off your followers, and the repetition has no impact on the trending process.
    (Each Tweet's tag counts only once. Seriously. That's it. No mas. Don't do it. Clear? Fine.)

  • Don't tweet to @maddow or @maddowblog. —Because that would suck, and the karma from that is just not something you want to contemplate, nor do I want on my conscience.

  • Try and be cute, funny, or AA (appropriately adoring).

  • Boring is ok (we're used to that)

  • Don't be insipid. Seriously. Don't

Is General Soros Ok With This?

We never really know. Ever since 2006, when he got out of active political spending, the right wing sees him behind every hothouse, whorehouse and outhouse. 

But I can tell you from first hand knowledge, that Dear Leader simply adores Rachel, and would probably give $1 matching dollar for every #maddow tweet we make to the "Send Rush To Costa Rica." fund.

On the other hand, maybe he wouldn't.  He's a funny kinda guy, like that.  (But not anything like all those other left wing billionaires we work for.) 

How You Can Help

   Follow These Names

  • Follow @maddowTag  for more info — Don't panic, it's just @shoq behind the curtain

   Tweet This Page ­

  • Using the ugly green "Tweet This" button at bottom of post

   Tweet These Too

  • RT @shoq: Come Play #Maddow Tag On Rachel @Maddow's Birthday ~Thurs April 1st ~ #p2  Detail: http://bit.ly/maddowtag #p2
  • RT @shoq: Please FOLLOW: @maddowtag for @Maddow's Birthday Tag Day info.  Details: http://shoqvalue.com/maddow #p2

Please copy exactly, including RT.  affects search rank

About Rachel Maddow

Show And Contact Information

Contact us

Follow us on Twitter

Partisan Crashers: CNN Knows What It's Getting with Erickson

Make no mistake, CNN knows exactly what it's getting with Erickson — and it wants just that. Sam Feist's a spectacularly pompous ass, and his fingerprints are all over this hire; as much as I'd love to wind up eating my words, I can't imagine a scenario in which a blogger uprising from the left would make Feist and CNN reconsider putting Erickson on the air. In fact, they're probably enjoying the immediate rush of attention that they'd counted on all along.


Huffpo's comments are limited to 250 words. That just wasn't enough room, so I posted some of this there, and linked back here. I hope they post it. Obviously, you should read it before continuing.

Chaz,

As one of the more visible of those "left leaning" partisan crashers on Twitter, inundating CNN with "bloodthirsty outrage," I am amused by the sheer volume of words you have just expended, basically saying "Oh, those CNN boys will be boys?"

 Are you so cynical from your years helping these unwholesome whores, that you simply roll over and let them fail or succeed with their gambit without even a token cry of outrage or resistance?  Do you think you're educating us by telling us that they knew full well what the reaction would be to hiring Erickson? That was obvious from the first tweet from Sam Feist, and the cover fire he'd already arranged with his troopers like Ed Henry, who were armed with the corporate talking points before the words hit the first browser.

Your screed is precisely the kind of droll, oh-so-worldly, inside baseball acquiescence to what these concorporate tools do, that gave us Lou Dobbs, Glenn Beck, and Michelle Malkin in the first place. In 2005, FAIR captured Jon Klein admitting how predictable such muted, weak-kneed reactions from the left have become.

Almost as if bragging about how silly it is to not understand the ratings rationales of the big boys, you sound far too willing to just accept—with nary a word of objection—one of the more influential conservative voices on the web as a regular co-host, just before the most important midterm election of our lifetimes.  And If you think they  hired Erickson just to pilfer a few Fox ratings points, you are more politically naive than he is homophobic. 

Erickson is not "some blogger." Redstate, Human Events, and their parent, are linchpins of a very well oiled GOP message machine that is now cross-connected with a dizzying array of social networks that reach all the way down to the school board level.  All this new Ministry of Untruth needs is a visible minister up there in the pulpit each day.  By allowing CNN to put one of the functioning heads of that machine on TV every night is almost inviting electoral genocide in November. They could only get a more strident and dedicated mouth organ if Rush Limbaugh or David Koch took the job.

Your tone suggests you're almost looking forward to this, as if your media and country were a game, put out there for your snarky-good entertainment value. But on your blog, you also "kind of like Andrew Breitbart," another low-life partisan demagogue doing his level best to wreck democracy while he profits from selling the poison seeds of its demise. Perhaps it wasn't your intent, but that doesn't matter.  You're far too cavalier about sitting up on the hill, from a distance, and watching yet another preventable train wreck happen before our national eyes. My gut tells me you probably have health insurance.

CNN and it's legions of modestly talented pseudo-journalists, and the flaming blowhards like Breitbart and Erickson are not our biggest problem. It's the progressive hand wringers, and oh-so "in the know" insiders, blithely accepting the indignities forced upon us each day, who support and empower the evil that these men and women do to us, our spirit, our nation, and our future.

Instead of pretending you know so much about what motivates the people who once put food in your mouth, why don't you turn your skilled pen toward writing something that exposes what they do—in detail—so others are better armed to combat them, now, and in the future.

You may really enjoy this media meltdown, sliding another steaming heap of corporate re-manufactured slime another few feet down our throats each week.  But some of us have had more than enough of it.