Categories
«  
  »

Top 10 reasons why Massachusetts Democrats should vote on Tuesday:

By Shoq, on January 17, 2010, at 11:59 pm

10. Everyone you know is underpaid, underinsured or underemployed, and the idea of a Republican winning anything is scarier than Jay Leno returning to the 11:35 time period.

9. Rush Limbaugh thinks that it would be very white of you if you'd just stay home.

8. Ted Kennedy’s seat, whose dream was Health Care for all Americans, will be the one used to actually kill Health Care Reform for all Americans.

7. Bankers, insurance, energy, and credit card companies were counting on you to just stay home and pay bills.

6. Scott Brown thinks you won't show because you were born out of wedlock and never did have a real birth certificate.

5. You're paying for the worst recession in modern times, while Dick Armey is telling millions of voters with hundreds of teeth that you and your sloppy finances caused it.

4. You can tell your friends that Glenn Beck once cried because of you.

3. 2000 through 2008. You remember them… right?

2. Sarah Palin is praying that you won't.

1. You know that only voting can prevent your nation from sliding right back into the right wing, corporate dominated, science hating, pluralism fearing, gay bashing, infrastructure ignoring, education slashing, marriage mashing, arts crushing, book burning, war mongering, bigoted cesspool of greed and self-destructiveness that you hoped it was finally crawling out of. 


FACT: Democrats outnumber Republicans by 2 to 1 in Massachusetts.

The only way that Scott Brown can win Teddy Kennedy's former seat is if good Democrats don't vote.

So what are you doing this Tuesday?

Can you spare a few moments to save your country?

 

If you enjoyed this, please retweet it. Viral views can sometimes shape the news.

Top 10 reasons why Massachusetts Democrats should vote on Tuesday:
January 17th, 2010 | Category: Coakley, Politics
  • Conservative Teabagger
    Suck it libs. Your agenda sucks.
  • Our agenda is yours. That's the funny thing. But you're having too much fun cheering in a game you barely understand to grasp that core concept. Maybe when Coaches Beck and Armey have a billion dollars, you'll start to get it. But I doubt it. You'd have to actually read something.
  • Conservative Teabagger
    The conservative (not Republican, big difference) agenda is about smaller government, lower taxes and an environment that is conducive to business so they can employ people. The stupid Obama agenda, which Massachusetts voters outright REJECTED last night is about taking over business, healthcare, paying off unions and other supporters, raising taxes and trying to implement socialism in America.

    Those agenda's are exact opposite.

    btw - I read just fine - it's liberals like yourself that have been drinking the Obama Kool-aid for so long you can't put a coherent argument together.

    Nice try tho.
  • davidalsofromseattle
    Are you sure it is the Republicans that are corporate dominated, pluralism fearing, infrastructure ignoring, education destroying, book burning, war mongering, bigoted cesspool of greed and self-destructiveness?

    What have the Dem's done for Education other than pour good money after bad? Why is that the most highly funded schools are also seeing the biggest failures? How can anyone say the Dem's are not bigoted. Have you been hidding under a rock? And war mongering... really? Missed the headlines, huh?

    The Republicans have problems. Big problems. So do the Dem's. And when EITHER PARTY is in COMPLETE control, the nation DIES. Period.
  • Boston
    This is about Mass voters being destroyed by liberal taxation. I think that we are done with it. Time to move forward instead of propping up the Kennedy dynasty. Move On.
  • John
    funny Shoq that for most of the last 40 years, Democrats have had the majority in Congress, and Congress makes the laws. Don't act like the Democrats weren't a big part of the demise of this once great nation.
  • stuartoneill
    Are you nuts? You need a history lesson. The Hill has swapped back and forth repeatedly. Only Clinton had the balls to say to Ginrich "Go ahead and shut down the govt and see what happens." He did and wow goodbye. Really the time from 2000 laid most of the active landmines that are going off today. Notice I said MOST not all. Everyone needs to take responsibility. But taking responsibility doesn't mean have a strategy identical to tactic of having the Senate Minority leader come right out and say, "We're going to say no period. It doesn't matter what changes are made." That's not a responsible strategy.
  • Real_World
    Not a single reason given why I should vote FOR Martha.
  • Correct, Beaver,

    For the same reason most voters, and #teapartiers didn't know Scott brown a month ago. This isn't about Martha Coakley. It's about the direction of a country after 30 years of ruinous, supply side greed and rampant stupidity under conservative guidance. And honest people admit it.
blog comments powered by Disqus